After thoroughly insulting Nigeria's leader for the state of Nigeria, 2nd rate Ghanaian Professor of Economics must now be embarrassed that perhaps the world's pre-eminent economics magazine, Forbes, has listed Professor Ayittey's country Ghana as a nation that has one of the world's worst economies. According to American published Forbes Magazine, Ghana is poor by design.
Professor Ayittey had insinuated that President Jonathan was of unsound mind and urged Nigerians to remove him. He also made uncomplimentary pronouncements about Nigeria's economy. However, Forbes rated the Nigerian economy as better ran than the Ghanaian economy and described the Ghanaian economy as not just badly run, but "poor by design".
Ayittey, who is a paid consultant who speaks the minds of his clients has surprisingly been celebrated by the likes of Bashir Yusuf, and Elrufai suggesting that his comments on Nigeria were procured.
Please read what Forbes Magazine wrote here (CLICK HERE). See full text below;
The World's Worst Economies: These countries aren't unlucky--they're poor by design.
Ghana has the
world's largest manmade lake and the 1-gigawatt Aksombo Hydroelectric
Plant, built to supply electricity to Africa's largest aluminum smelter.
But the smelter has been idle since 2009, a casualty of low aluminum
prices and persistent electricity shortages that have forced the
government to divert the power elsewhere.
Ghana is a
typical example of the world's worst-managed economies: It's a country
that shouldn't be poor, but it is. The West African nation's gross
domestic product per capita fell 9% last year to $621, ranking it 154th
out of 184 countries tracked by the International Monetary Fund, below
resource-impoverished Haiti. With a $3 billion trade deficit last year
and $4.9 billion in external debt, Ghana is struggling to pay its bills
even as it sits on some of the world's biggest reserves of gold and
bauxite, as well as considerable amounts of offshore oil, which is being
developed by Anadarko Petroleum ( APC - news - people ) and others.
Article Controls
Article Controls
"Ghana's problems
are mostly homegrown," said Peter Allum, the IMF's mission chief to
Ghana, in February. Forbes ranks Ghana ninth on our list of the world's
worst economies.
As the world
focuses on Greece and the rest of the so-called PIIGs--Portugal, Italy
and Ireland--in their fight to reverse years of irresponsible fiscal
policies, another group of nations make them look positively
well-managed. Forbes screened IMF data for countries that have low and
declining per-capita GDP, high trade deficits and high inflation, all
indicators of bad economic management regardless of the country's
inherent wealth.
All have at least
one trait in common: Their governments discourage private
investment--and economic growth--through policies of crony capitalism,
expropriation or arbitrary enforcement of the laws. That makes it hard
to generate hard currency to pay off government debt and discourages
citizens from investing in education to improve their own economic lot.
"Most of these
vulnerably low-income countries are in a trap," said Otaviano Canuto,
vice president and head of the World Bank's Poverty Reduction and
Economic Management Network. "The climate is not conducive to
investments, not only in factories and agricultural improvements, but in
education."
No surprise as to
the winner of this race to the bottom: Zimbabwe, a country where the
annual inflation rate hit the surreal level of more than 500 billion
percent in late 2008 as the government of dictator Robert Mugabe tried
to print his way out of his own mistaken economic policies. Before the
fever broke last year, Zimbabwe restaurants felt compelled to post signs
reminding patrons not to use the nearly worthless dollar bills as
toilet paper. Zimbabwe's inflation rate has since dropped to around 5%
as the country abandoned its currency and allowed transactions to be
conducted in U.S. dollars and other currencies. But it still was forced
to import 500,000 tons of maize last year to make up for shortfalls in
its once-bountiful agricultural sector.
Ranking fifth on
the list is Nicaragua, the only Latin American country to show such a
poisonous combination of poverty and stagnant growth. Nicaragua's
inflation-adjusted GDP fell 1.5% in 2009 and foreign investors have
shunned the country since 1980s socialist President Daniel Ortega
returned to office in 2007. Textile manufacturers have closed and
European aid agencies balked at supporting the Ortega government after
flawed elections in 2008. One reliable source of income in this
socialist paradise: remittances from expatriates, which represented 13%
of GDP in 2008.
In eighth place
is Liberia, another resource-rich nation that has mismanaged its way to
poverty through decades of corruption and civil war. The country has
been relatively stable since 2005 and may achieve 6% GDP growth this
year. But that's a GDP of less than $900 million, with rubber exports
the single largest source of foreign currency at $170 million.
Registrations of foreign ships brings in another $18 million, hardly
enough to make a dent in the country's $3.4 billion debt. Last year
commercial creditors agreed to call it even at 3 cents on the dollar,
possibly allowing Liberia to begin the cycle of borrowing and defaulting
anew. Some economic growth is expected after Arcelor Mittal ( MT - news
- people ) begins shipping iron ore from the Yekapi complex in 2011.
hmmn!i was one of those who thought the Ghanian economy was better!
ReplyDelete